home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.cc.ic.ac.uk!usenet
- From: Terroidal Man <ajh1@ic.ac.uk>
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: Computerworld Norway is telling us lies about Amiga....
- Date: 26 Jan 1996 16:36:57 GMT
- Organization: Imperial College (EEE)
- Message-ID: <4eavv9$r4p@oban.cc.ic.ac.uk>
- References: <3106440F.738D@edb.uib.no> <4e9fml$gcc@news.microsoft.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ampere.ee.ic.ac.uk
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (X11; I; SunOS 5.4 sun4c)
- X-URL: news:4e9fml$gcc@news.microsoft.com
-
- >>Besides Windows 95 is not offering real multitasking!!!!!!!
- >
- >And in what particular sense is Win95 not real multitasking? I will
- >grant that the Win16Mutex() can cause problems, but the same deal
- >exists on the Amiga if a process locks up inside of a Forbid() block.
- >(Actually, its far worse on the Amiga).
-
- Yes, but isn't the win95 way cheating.... The machines run a lot slower because
- their multitasking is done with a stack system (ie this prog for a bit, now
- this one, now this one etc). Taht must be one of the major reasons for win95
- to being so much slower than old win, on all but the absolute top end
- machines...
- Sorry if my info is wrong, flame me...
-
- Andy Hall
- --
- "The Sparrows are flying again..."
-
- the opinions expressed here are not neccesarily
- those of anyone else in the universe
-
- none of the above is (c)1996 Teroidal Man
-
- p.s. (c) is intended to mean "to be taken seriously"
-
- "Thank You, and goodbye"
-
-